tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4109157903763444447.post4162969456081158602..comments2023-10-18T12:55:50.552+00:00Comments on At Flores in the Azores: Did you know ...Neil Kinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15567487892239196569noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4109157903763444447.post-44998726617852286682009-09-13T08:44:42.646+00:002009-09-13T08:44:42.646+00:00The only one I can think of is Jake the Peg. The...The only one I can think of is Jake the Peg. There was a local three-legged dog called Tripod. Never heard of a five-legged dog though.Marynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4109157903763444447.post-80673025972747081392009-09-13T03:26:49.762+00:002009-09-13T03:26:49.762+00:00Is this what you do when Baby Chou & BB come t...Is this what you do when Baby Chou & BB come to visit? Or will you engage in a watercress-foraging/-cooking marathon this time? LOL!Kathiehttp://www.mycalifornianfriends.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4109157903763444447.post-91966105270991058252009-09-13T02:38:53.370+00:002009-09-13T02:38:53.370+00:00No it doesn't.
Whether you have fewer than tw...No it doesn't.<br /><br />Whether you have fewer than two legs due to genotype, phenotype or freak yachting accident is beside the point.<br /><br />The fact remains that, at any given moment, there are more people on the planet with one leg (for whatever reason) than there are with three so the average number per head is less than two.<br /><br />I wish I hadn't started this now ...Neil Kinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15567487892239196569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4109157903763444447.post-82084711656847365152009-09-12T22:30:06.697+00:002009-09-12T22:30:06.697+00:00Hmm, I suppose it depends on whether you're co...Hmm, I suppose it depends on whether you're counting according to the number of legs with which they were born (genotype), or how many they still have by time of death (phenotype).Kathiehttp://www.mycalifornianfriends.com/receptions.htmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4109157903763444447.post-49505099244990363652009-09-12T21:46:00.487+00:002009-09-12T21:46:00.487+00:00Do you know, as I was typing my post, I did have i...Do you know, as I was typing my post, I did have in mind the potential for people with more than two legs to distort the average but in the interests of simplicity I decided to omit that point.<br /><br />I'm no expert but I'd be fairly sure that the number of people with one leg heavily outweighs the number of people with three so the original point holds good.Neil Kinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15567487892239196569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4109157903763444447.post-7637095490749206352009-09-12T20:09:21.348+00:002009-09-12T20:09:21.348+00:00This argument is vaguely reminiscent of (and about...This argument is vaguely reminiscent of (and about as logical as) Zeno's paradox.<br /><br />It assumes no one's ever born with more than two legs, or that such a population's lower-limb count is outnumbered by that of folks born with fewer than two. Since amputations affect only phenotype, not genotype (natural-born trait), offspring of amputees with originally more than one leg are most likely to inherit one or another parent's genotype (barring genetic mutation or other birth defect). Also, how do you count thalidomide babies and others born with incomplete limbs?<br /><br />Quoth Benjamin Disraeli (later paraphrased by Mark Twain): "Lies, damned lies, and statistics!"<br /><br />Also, do those folks count who sometimes render themselves temporarily legless? ;-)Kathiehttp://www.mycalifornianfriends.com/receptions.htmnoreply@blogger.com